Followers of this blog will remember the summer of 2009 when we reported on the Iranian uprising, and how social media, namely Twitter, had been influential in spreading the message of dissent. Youtube videos of protesters being beaten, or worse, were all over cable news. While many predicted the end of the Iranian theocracy, it never came to pass. Instead, the authorities crack down hard, and little has been changed in the months following.
Then came the protest this month in Tunisia. For some time now, discontent has been rising in Tunisia. Prime Minister Ben Ali, who has been in power since 1987, had always been an authoritarian leader, but the national economy was growing. GDP tripled under his administration. Yet, northern Africa, and much of the Arab world, was changing. Unfortunately for Ben Ali, Tunisian youths were getting mobile phones and creating facebook accounts just at a time when employment was slowing. They were seeing the modern world, but were left with only despair. Then a young, unemployed Tunisian named Mohamid Bouazizi set himself on fire after he was slapped by a police officer for selling fruit along the road. As the protest grew, fueled by groups created on facebook, Ben Ali came under increasing pressure. On January 15th, he was declared "absent" by the Supreme Court, and fled to exile in Saudi Arabia.
Comparisons to the "green revolution" in Iran are probably unavoidable, with one big distinction. These protest were successful. It remains to be seen what kind of government Tunisia will create, but it seems everyone knows (or thinks they do) the politics of these protesters. First of all, their politics are not religious. They are based on freedom of expression and creating opportunities for all. From the western viewpoint, this seems positive. Now, protest are spreading to Egypt, and the government has blocked Twitter. Acts of self-immolation have taken place in Algeria. There are unconfirmed reports of protest in Yemen. Today, Iraqi citizens attacked police after a car bomb killed dozens. This could be the beginning of true self-government in the Islamic world.
We should not get our hopes to grand, however. The West, Europe and the United States, have been colonizing Africa and the Middle East for centuries, and this will not be quickly forgotten. While human rights watchers will be pleased at new democratic governments, these new voters may not be eager to follow directions.
27 January 2011
25 January 2011
Obama On Target
The Constitution demands that the President address Congress on a regular basis to discuss the state of our union. Today was Obama's second such address.
Many talked of the mess that President Obama was in after the mid-term election. Obama himself called it a shellacking. Since the election, however, he has managed to strike a deal with Republicans on tax cuts, and signed legislation ending the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. His speech he gave after the assassination attempt on Gabrielle Giffords was an overwhelming success, and his approval ratings have returned to 51%. This state of the union was seen as a key moment for Obama to keep his momemtum rolling.
So, how did he do? Obama's theme was "Winning the Future." He spoke of the innovation that America is famous for, and called on the country to keep striving ahead in the 21st century. To this aim, he called for education reform, citing his "Race to the Top" program. He called on elected officials to give teachers proper respect, but also demanded accountability. For this educated work force to truly thrive in the United States, we need the infrastructure to support it. We are being outspent by China, Russia, and Europe, and our infrastructure is crumbling. It is vital for American business that they have reliable communication and transportation.
It wasn't all progressive utopia, though. The President spoke of the corporate tax rate, filled with loopholes, yet among the highest rates on earth. This system guarantees that big corporations can avoid paying taxes all together, while most small business suffer under oppressive tax rates. Tax reform has been a goal of conservatives and progressives for a long time, but too many interest groups have a stake for any progress to be made. Obama has placed the issue on the agenda, and he has proved effective at forming unlikely political coalitions.
Of course, any policy matter that one could think of was addressed in some way. From energy to healthcare to foreign wars, Obama took positions designed to gain support from moderates and business leaders without alienating his base. Did he accomplish this? It's hard to say. Many liberals don't want the President to compromise with the center-right, and to them, this speech with be just another disappointment by Obama. Given the new political landscape in Washington, however, he may not have much choice.
Obama has always been an effective communicator. In fact, he probably should do it more. He has tried his best to govern as a progressive, and probably has turned off some of those who voted for him in 2008. In the next two years, he will no doubt drift to the center. This will be great for his re-election campaign. While many consider him too cool, he is best when he appears to be the grown-up. Defend his base, and find common ground with fiscal conservatives, and he will sail to a second term. Then we'll see what kind of liberal he really is!
Many talked of the mess that President Obama was in after the mid-term election. Obama himself called it a shellacking. Since the election, however, he has managed to strike a deal with Republicans on tax cuts, and signed legislation ending the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. His speech he gave after the assassination attempt on Gabrielle Giffords was an overwhelming success, and his approval ratings have returned to 51%. This state of the union was seen as a key moment for Obama to keep his momemtum rolling.
So, how did he do? Obama's theme was "Winning the Future." He spoke of the innovation that America is famous for, and called on the country to keep striving ahead in the 21st century. To this aim, he called for education reform, citing his "Race to the Top" program. He called on elected officials to give teachers proper respect, but also demanded accountability. For this educated work force to truly thrive in the United States, we need the infrastructure to support it. We are being outspent by China, Russia, and Europe, and our infrastructure is crumbling. It is vital for American business that they have reliable communication and transportation.
It wasn't all progressive utopia, though. The President spoke of the corporate tax rate, filled with loopholes, yet among the highest rates on earth. This system guarantees that big corporations can avoid paying taxes all together, while most small business suffer under oppressive tax rates. Tax reform has been a goal of conservatives and progressives for a long time, but too many interest groups have a stake for any progress to be made. Obama has placed the issue on the agenda, and he has proved effective at forming unlikely political coalitions.
Of course, any policy matter that one could think of was addressed in some way. From energy to healthcare to foreign wars, Obama took positions designed to gain support from moderates and business leaders without alienating his base. Did he accomplish this? It's hard to say. Many liberals don't want the President to compromise with the center-right, and to them, this speech with be just another disappointment by Obama. Given the new political landscape in Washington, however, he may not have much choice.
Obama has always been an effective communicator. In fact, he probably should do it more. He has tried his best to govern as a progressive, and probably has turned off some of those who voted for him in 2008. In the next two years, he will no doubt drift to the center. This will be great for his re-election campaign. While many consider him too cool, he is best when he appears to be the grown-up. Defend his base, and find common ground with fiscal conservatives, and he will sail to a second term. Then we'll see what kind of liberal he really is!
24 January 2011
Olbermann And Out
The drama started in November. Olbermann was suspended for four days from MSNBC for making political donations to democratic candidates, including Gabrielle Giffords and failed Senate candidate Jack Conway. Reports were that Olbermann had planned to go on ABC's Good Morning America to discuss the situation, but was threatened with being fired. Olbermann has a colorful history with his superiors, from his very public exit from ESPN, to his employment by Rupert Murdoch, and previous battles with MSNBC management. Although everyone involved at MSNBC is keeping very tight-lipped over his departure, he is said to have received a generous severance and will not be able to appear on television for some months.
Olbermann gained many liberal fans during the Bush years when he became one of few to oppose the Iraq war. He has managed to alienate some over partisan rhetoric. He supported Barack Obama during the Democratic primary for president, and angered many supporters of Hillary Clinton. It appears he may have made a similar mistake in his support for individual candidates, at least in the eyes of his bosses at MSNBC. While political commentators certainly have the right to support certain candidates over others, perhaps they are better suited to stick to discussing individual issues. Political candidates come with all kinds of strengths and positions that one should consider carefully, and some viewers may assume things about the host that are not true.
With that being said, we can discuss the next phase of Olbermann's career. Many are already soliciting him for public service. Olbermann is certainly passionate and educated about the issues. There can be no doubt about where he stands or what he brings to the table. In fact, many of his positions may be good for the United States and middle-class Americans, but having Olbermann as a politician may not be a good idea. He is known for his heated political rhetoric, at a time when everyone else is talking about toning it down. He has made dozens of "Special Comments," many about fellow Democrats that would inevitably be his colleagues.
Lawrence O'Donnell is set to replace Olbermann at 8pm on MSNBC. O'Donnell is a veteran of Washington and Hollywood, having been a contributor to The West Wing. For a more personal look at Kieth Olbermann.
18 January 2011
No Impact Man
This week for Reviewsday, we looked at the 2009 documentary "No Impact Man." Colin Beaven and his family attempt to spend one year living in New York City while making no negative impact on the environment.
Beaven in a non-fiction writer who vowed to turn his political beliefs into practical actions for reducing carbon emissions and pollution. First, his family gave up all carbon emitting transportation, including subways and planes, and shopping for anything new. They also gave up restaurants and packaged foods in order to reduce the amount of trash they produced. After a series of steps that included giving up toilet paper and the refrigerator, they turned off their power completely. Oftentimes during the film, Beaven expresses doubts about the project, and worries about the perception of him among other environmentalist.
While it is true that Beaven's methods are extreme, he is making a point. By giving up just about everything, Beaven shows what practices are easy and practical, and which ones are more difficult. His family also enjoys, somewhat unexpectedly, a new connection with nature. His daughter chases lightning bugs through a community garden, and his wife enjoys a vacation to a farm upstate.
While many people are politically active, few people make sacrifices that bring their lives in line with their beliefs. Liberals may complain about the wars fought for crude oil, but how many start taking the bus? Although we tell ourselves that we are doing our part, it is important to remember that we could always do more.
Beaven in a non-fiction writer who vowed to turn his political beliefs into practical actions for reducing carbon emissions and pollution. First, his family gave up all carbon emitting transportation, including subways and planes, and shopping for anything new. They also gave up restaurants and packaged foods in order to reduce the amount of trash they produced. After a series of steps that included giving up toilet paper and the refrigerator, they turned off their power completely. Oftentimes during the film, Beaven expresses doubts about the project, and worries about the perception of him among other environmentalist.
While it is true that Beaven's methods are extreme, he is making a point. By giving up just about everything, Beaven shows what practices are easy and practical, and which ones are more difficult. His family also enjoys, somewhat unexpectedly, a new connection with nature. His daughter chases lightning bugs through a community garden, and his wife enjoys a vacation to a farm upstate.
While many people are politically active, few people make sacrifices that bring their lives in line with their beliefs. Liberals may complain about the wars fought for crude oil, but how many start taking the bus? Although we tell ourselves that we are doing our part, it is important to remember that we could always do more.
17 January 2011
King's Legacy Liberal, Complex
Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the United States, and this would have been King's 82nd birthday. King used non-violent protest to bring about civil rights for minorities in the United States. His biggest mentor in the United States was Bayard Rustin. Rustin was a homosexual Quaker and had been inspired by Mahatma Ghandi. When King traveled to India in 1959, he said Ghandi "embodied in his life certain universal principles that are inherent in the structure of the universe, and these principles are as inescapable as the law of gravitation."
King made his name during the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955, but is best remembered for his "I Have A Dream" speech, much of which was improvised. The speech took place in 1963 during the March on Washington. Although the March is remembered as an inspiration for all Americans, including blacks, at the time it was much more controversial. King acquiesced to pressure from President Kennedy to tone down his remarks, lest they effect the passage of the Civil Rights Bill, and Malcolm X, a far more militant civil rights advocate, called it the "Farce on Washington." In the end, King's speech struck the perfect tone, and helped pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Here is when King's positions become a little more controversial, and his legacy more complicated. In 1965, King voiced his opposition to the Vietnam War, arguing that the military occupation was steering money away from helping poor people. "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death." In 1968, King started the Poor People's Campaign. The campaign sought to bring attention to the plight of all under-served Americans, regardless of race. This lead to a backlash from civil right leaders, Malcolm X and even Baynard Rustin. King envisioned a "multiracial army of the poor" marching on Washington. He even supported certain reparations, but not only to African-Americans. "It should benefit the disadvantaged of all races," he said, claiming that it would alleviate social ills such as violence, divorce, and drug use. The Poor People's March on Washington did take place, but not until after Kings assassination. The protesters constructed a tent city on the national mall, called Resurrection City.
As a nation, we have come a long way on issues of race. We have an African-American president, and dozens of elected African-American Representatives, including King's friend John Lewis (D-GA). On issues of militarism and poverty, however, we still have far to go. The United States continues to spend billions on military occupations in Asia, and the gap between rich and poor is still growing. As a nation, we need to recognize Martin Luther King for all of his positions and achievements, and not just cherry-pick the ones that fit into our convenient narrative about America as a land of opportunity. Precisely because African-Americans have come so far, we need to remember King as he was, and continue to fight for what he believed in, improvement in the lives of all Americans, regardless of race, peace and nonviolence, and the end of American colonialism.
King made his name during the Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955, but is best remembered for his "I Have A Dream" speech, much of which was improvised. The speech took place in 1963 during the March on Washington. Although the March is remembered as an inspiration for all Americans, including blacks, at the time it was much more controversial. King acquiesced to pressure from President Kennedy to tone down his remarks, lest they effect the passage of the Civil Rights Bill, and Malcolm X, a far more militant civil rights advocate, called it the "Farce on Washington." In the end, King's speech struck the perfect tone, and helped pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Here is when King's positions become a little more controversial, and his legacy more complicated. In 1965, King voiced his opposition to the Vietnam War, arguing that the military occupation was steering money away from helping poor people. "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death." In 1968, King started the Poor People's Campaign. The campaign sought to bring attention to the plight of all under-served Americans, regardless of race. This lead to a backlash from civil right leaders, Malcolm X and even Baynard Rustin. King envisioned a "multiracial army of the poor" marching on Washington. He even supported certain reparations, but not only to African-Americans. "It should benefit the disadvantaged of all races," he said, claiming that it would alleviate social ills such as violence, divorce, and drug use. The Poor People's March on Washington did take place, but not until after Kings assassination. The protesters constructed a tent city on the national mall, called Resurrection City.
As a nation, we have come a long way on issues of race. We have an African-American president, and dozens of elected African-American Representatives, including King's friend John Lewis (D-GA). On issues of militarism and poverty, however, we still have far to go. The United States continues to spend billions on military occupations in Asia, and the gap between rich and poor is still growing. As a nation, we need to recognize Martin Luther King for all of his positions and achievements, and not just cherry-pick the ones that fit into our convenient narrative about America as a land of opportunity. Precisely because African-Americans have come so far, we need to remember King as he was, and continue to fight for what he believed in, improvement in the lives of all Americans, regardless of race, peace and nonviolence, and the end of American colonialism.
16 January 2011
Real Maher Still Politcally Incorrect
Once again it is time for our Sunday Shows feature, but this week we are taking a look at a show that actually comes on Friday night. "Real Time with Bill Maher" is entering its ninth season on HBO, and is possibly the best weekly political show on television. Maher has usually been labeled as a libertarian, especially when he hosted "Politically Incorrect", but recently drifted more into progressivism. To be fair, however, he tries to have at least one conservative on per week, and this is what creates such a good show. Rarely on television can we see such vibrant political debate.
The opening guest this week was President Obama's financial advisor Elizabeth Warren. Warren is a staunch defender of the middle class, and was instrumental in the formation of the new Financial Consumer Protection Agency. Her nomination to run that agency was blocked in congress, however. She downplayed that situation on friday, and insisted that she could be equally, if not more, effective in creating the new agency and being its biggest advocate.
The panel included democratic stratigest James Carville, GOP stratigest Mike Murphy, and actor Martin Short. Topics included efforts to repeal the healthcare bill, and the growing division between rich and poor. Of course all of America is talking about "the tone," and Maher promised to do his part, changing his segment "New Rules" to "Gentle Reminders."
So while we still encourage everyone to watch the Sunday Shows on the free channels, keep in mind that HBO is a great destination for political junkies. They show great documentaries, including thier recent original documentary about Hurricane Katrina, "God Willing And Creek Don't Rise," and have worthwhile series such as "True Blood," "Big Love," and "The Ricky Gervais Show." While it may seem ridiculous to pay for one channel, HBO serves up some of the best films and shows on television. Or as they would have it, "It's not TV, It's HBO."
The opening guest this week was President Obama's financial advisor Elizabeth Warren. Warren is a staunch defender of the middle class, and was instrumental in the formation of the new Financial Consumer Protection Agency. Her nomination to run that agency was blocked in congress, however. She downplayed that situation on friday, and insisted that she could be equally, if not more, effective in creating the new agency and being its biggest advocate.
The panel included democratic stratigest James Carville, GOP stratigest Mike Murphy, and actor Martin Short. Topics included efforts to repeal the healthcare bill, and the growing division between rich and poor. Of course all of America is talking about "the tone," and Maher promised to do his part, changing his segment "New Rules" to "Gentle Reminders."
So while we still encourage everyone to watch the Sunday Shows on the free channels, keep in mind that HBO is a great destination for political junkies. They show great documentaries, including thier recent original documentary about Hurricane Katrina, "God Willing And Creek Don't Rise," and have worthwhile series such as "True Blood," "Big Love," and "The Ricky Gervais Show." While it may seem ridiculous to pay for one channel, HBO serves up some of the best films and shows on television. Or as they would have it, "It's not TV, It's HBO."
15 January 2011
History And Deception
While in the United States, one football tournament has the attention of sports fans focused on the gridiron and rooting their teams on to the Super Bowl, a football tournament of a different kind is taking place in the United Kingdom. The Football Association Cup, or FA Cup, originally kicked off in 1871 and is the oldest trophy in professional sports. The third round kicked off last weekend.
The FA Cup is a single elimination tournament open to all teams in England and a select number of teams in Wales. There are 14 rounds, and every team in the top six tiers of English football are automatically entered. This arrangement means that small, semi-professional clubs have a chance to play, and maybe defeat, some of the biggest clubs in world football.
The best example of a giant-killing in the third round this year comes from League Two side Stevenage. Stevenage play in the fourth tier of English football, and are currently 85th in the overall table. They hosted Newcastle United, who are currently the 9th best team in England, and were able to come away with a 3-1 victory.
The biggest game on the docket, however, was Manchester United versus Liverpool. United and Liverpool are first and second in terms of English Championships. Both play in the northwest of England, and are bitter rivals. Although Manchester United sit atop the table while Liverpool are 13th, we know that league position is meaningless in the FA Cup. The match attracted even more attention when Liverpool sacked their latest manager in favor of Kenny Dalglish, who was a legendary player at Liverpool in the 1970s and 80s.
The match did not live up to its potential. In the first minutes, referee Howard Webb awarded United forward Dmitar Berbatov a penalty, on what was clearly a dive. United scored and were up 1-0. Then, still in the first half, Webb sent off Liverpool captain Steven Gerard for a sliding tackle on Micheal Carrick. Manchester United have been grinding out wins all season, and the final hour was comfortable for them.
Howard Webb is considered one of the best referees in the game. He officiated the 2010 World Cup Final, and was roundly criticised from both sides, which probably means he did a good job. This was not his best performance, though, and in a match that was televised around the world, that is a shame. Most of the blame should not go to Webb, however. Diving has become an enormous problem in the game, and both poor calls were aided by player simulation. In the heat of battle, it is asking too much of referees to determine what is a dive and what is a foul in the moment. FIFA needs to step up, and use video replay to hand out punishments (suspensions) to players who try to deceive the officials.
The FA Cup is a single elimination tournament open to all teams in England and a select number of teams in Wales. There are 14 rounds, and every team in the top six tiers of English football are automatically entered. This arrangement means that small, semi-professional clubs have a chance to play, and maybe defeat, some of the biggest clubs in world football.
The best example of a giant-killing in the third round this year comes from League Two side Stevenage. Stevenage play in the fourth tier of English football, and are currently 85th in the overall table. They hosted Newcastle United, who are currently the 9th best team in England, and were able to come away with a 3-1 victory.
The biggest game on the docket, however, was Manchester United versus Liverpool. United and Liverpool are first and second in terms of English Championships. Both play in the northwest of England, and are bitter rivals. Although Manchester United sit atop the table while Liverpool are 13th, we know that league position is meaningless in the FA Cup. The match attracted even more attention when Liverpool sacked their latest manager in favor of Kenny Dalglish, who was a legendary player at Liverpool in the 1970s and 80s.
The match did not live up to its potential. In the first minutes, referee Howard Webb awarded United forward Dmitar Berbatov a penalty, on what was clearly a dive. United scored and were up 1-0. Then, still in the first half, Webb sent off Liverpool captain Steven Gerard for a sliding tackle on Micheal Carrick. Manchester United have been grinding out wins all season, and the final hour was comfortable for them.
Howard Webb is considered one of the best referees in the game. He officiated the 2010 World Cup Final, and was roundly criticised from both sides, which probably means he did a good job. This was not his best performance, though, and in a match that was televised around the world, that is a shame. Most of the blame should not go to Webb, however. Diving has become an enormous problem in the game, and both poor calls were aided by player simulation. In the heat of battle, it is asking too much of referees to determine what is a dive and what is a foul in the moment. FIFA needs to step up, and use video replay to hand out punishments (suspensions) to players who try to deceive the officials.
13 January 2011
Militant Evangelicalism
In the United States, the military is held in very high regard. As we have discussed recently on this blog, Americans have a very complex relationship with war and violence. Yet our military is made of recruits from all walks of American life, and this can cause friction when minorities wish to have their voices heard within this community. We saw this most recently with the debate over the "don't ask, don't tell", and now we are seeing this friction in the field of religious freedom.
The Army has started issuing annual "spiritual fitness" exams. All troops not deployed in a war zone are required to complete the questionnaire that ask if they would agree with such statements as "I often find comfort in religion or spiritual beliefs", "I believe there is a purpose in my life", and asking how often they attend religious services.
It is true that the military is facing serious problems with PTSD and suicide. Facing these problems is not only the right thing to do, it is vital to the national security of the United States. However, here the Armed Services have addressed the problem clumsily, and in a way that exposes their conservative (gop) bias. Close observers will remember the incident at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs in which cadets who did not believe in evangelical christianity faced discrimination. This newest incident is more proof of the links between evangelicalism, militarism, and colonialism in this country. Unbeknown to even most Americans, this love of god before country has America sliding headfirst into wars in Asia for almost a century, and bankrupting itself in the process.
The Army has started issuing annual "spiritual fitness" exams. All troops not deployed in a war zone are required to complete the questionnaire that ask if they would agree with such statements as "I often find comfort in religion or spiritual beliefs", "I believe there is a purpose in my life", and asking how often they attend religious services.
It is true that the military is facing serious problems with PTSD and suicide. Facing these problems is not only the right thing to do, it is vital to the national security of the United States. However, here the Armed Services have addressed the problem clumsily, and in a way that exposes their conservative (gop) bias. Close observers will remember the incident at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs in which cadets who did not believe in evangelical christianity faced discrimination. This newest incident is more proof of the links between evangelicalism, militarism, and colonialism in this country. Unbeknown to even most Americans, this love of god before country has America sliding headfirst into wars in Asia for almost a century, and bankrupting itself in the process.
12 January 2011
Haitian Hellhole
Today marks the first anniversary of the Haitian earthquake. The quake, which hit the poorest country in the western hemisphere, killed 316,00 people, and the situation has not improved in the year that has passed.
Haiti was not a first world nation before the earthquake, and that has only made its impact all the more severe. The quake destroyed thousands of homes, and clearing that rubble has barely begun. Land ownership records are rare in poor societies, and many Haitians have abandoned their homes, or are simply squatting in whatever shelter they can find. Of course, thousands still live in tent cities and are relying on the help of international aid organizations.
Those organizations are also providing food and water, which is bottled outside the country and shipped in. Although it is an island, Haiti has a high degree of water insecurity, and virtually all water sanitation has stopped. This has lead into another great crisis, the cholera epidemic.
Cholera is a water born illness. It causes vomiting and diarrhea, and the patient will die from dehydration. It can kill in as little as two days, and has already claimed 3,651 lives. Most western societies are no longer affected by cholera because of improved sanitation, but in Haiti, cholera risk becoming endemic the their society.
All of this means that Haitians require the help of the international community for the foreseeable future. The question remains, however, if Haiti is able to help itself. In November, Haitians went to the polls to elect an new government, but the voting was marred by scandal. The current president, Rene Preval, supports candidate Jude Celstin, who is scheduled to face challenger Mirlande Manigat in a runoff next month, but the Organization of American States has accused Celstin's supporters of vote fraud, and asked him to step down in favor of Michel Martelly. Both Celstin and Preval have rejected this request. With the results of the election in doubt, its hard to see how Haiti can achieve the political will to begin solving their mounting problems.
When the earthquake happened last January, the world saw one of the biggest outpourings of philanthropy ever, but sadly, most of that money has gone to waste or is sitting idle and unspent. So many are right to ask if anymore should be given, and it is a hard question to answer. Yet as citizens of the richest nation on the planet, it is our duty to help our neighbor, but the American government, and indeed the world, need to get serious about helping the people of Haiti while being sure to hold their leaders accountable. It is the question for 21st century diplomacy, how do we encourage leaders to live up to their responsibility to the world community without punishing those citizens that we are trying to liberate, er, help?
Haiti was not a first world nation before the earthquake, and that has only made its impact all the more severe. The quake destroyed thousands of homes, and clearing that rubble has barely begun. Land ownership records are rare in poor societies, and many Haitians have abandoned their homes, or are simply squatting in whatever shelter they can find. Of course, thousands still live in tent cities and are relying on the help of international aid organizations.
Those organizations are also providing food and water, which is bottled outside the country and shipped in. Although it is an island, Haiti has a high degree of water insecurity, and virtually all water sanitation has stopped. This has lead into another great crisis, the cholera epidemic.
Cholera is a water born illness. It causes vomiting and diarrhea, and the patient will die from dehydration. It can kill in as little as two days, and has already claimed 3,651 lives. Most western societies are no longer affected by cholera because of improved sanitation, but in Haiti, cholera risk becoming endemic the their society.
All of this means that Haitians require the help of the international community for the foreseeable future. The question remains, however, if Haiti is able to help itself. In November, Haitians went to the polls to elect an new government, but the voting was marred by scandal. The current president, Rene Preval, supports candidate Jude Celstin, who is scheduled to face challenger Mirlande Manigat in a runoff next month, but the Organization of American States has accused Celstin's supporters of vote fraud, and asked him to step down in favor of Michel Martelly. Both Celstin and Preval have rejected this request. With the results of the election in doubt, its hard to see how Haiti can achieve the political will to begin solving their mounting problems.
When the earthquake happened last January, the world saw one of the biggest outpourings of philanthropy ever, but sadly, most of that money has gone to waste or is sitting idle and unspent. So many are right to ask if anymore should be given, and it is a hard question to answer. Yet as citizens of the richest nation on the planet, it is our duty to help our neighbor, but the American government, and indeed the world, need to get serious about helping the people of Haiti while being sure to hold their leaders accountable. It is the question for 21st century diplomacy, how do we encourage leaders to live up to their responsibility to the world community without punishing those citizens that we are trying to liberate, er, help?
11 January 2011
Alternative Lifestyle
Most people know Maynard James Keenan from his work as frontman for alternative band Tool, and his solo project A Perfect Circle and Pusifer. Few would suspect, however, that the reclusive star would become have an interest in wine making, but the 2009 documentary Blood Into Wine, offers a rare view of a unique artist and entrepreneur.
Keenan moved to rural Arizona in the 1990s to escape the celebrity culture of Los Angeles. He soon partnered with winemaker Eric Glomski to form Arizona Stronghold Vineyards. Keenan also operates his own winery, Caduceus.
Together, Glomski and Keenan consider themselves pioneers of Arizona wine making, and the film shows just how little attention Arizona receives in the wine world. They describe the process of choosing grapes that best fit the climate of Arizona, and show the lengthy process of growing and trimming vines. The times of standing in a barrel and stomping grapes with your bare feet is long gone, and Clomski and Keenan invest millions in huge machines that ferment and bottle the wine. Yet it takes seven years for Keenan to bring his first bottle to completion, which he names after his mother, Judith.
Overall, the movie is enjoyable, and Keenan comes off likable, if somewhat aloof. Once he laughs at Patton Oswalt, but otherwise, hardly smiles the entire film. For fans of Tool, though, these will be miraculous insights. For fans of wine, the movie offers a glimpse of the hard work mostly seen only by residents of the world's wine capitals. For fans of documentaries, Blood Into Wine offers 99 minutes of passionate people bringing you into a world that few people truly understand.
09 January 2011
Tragic Rhetoric?
Today should be our first column spotlighting the Sunday talk shows, but all the shows have focused on the tragedy that took place yesterday in Arizona. Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was holding a public event at a Tuscon Safeway when 22 year old Jarod Lee Loughner shot her in the head, injured 19 others, and killed 6. Police are still searching for a possible accomplice.Although the suspect is obviously unstable, no motive was clear from the outset. Several prominent officials have blamed the tone of the political debate in Washington as a contributing factor. Arizona has been a hot bed for controversy. It has been the center of the debate over immigration, and President Obama remains unpopular.
We should, however, be careful not to blame Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. It is true that Palin "targeted" Giffords district, going so far as to put cross-hairs over a map of Arizona, but the only person responsible for Mr. Loughner's actions are Mr. Loughner.
This country has a complicated history with political violence, we were created from a war of revolution, and that is part of our national identity. From Lincoln and Kennedy to John Brown and Tim McViegh, when we see the government acting in ways in which we disapprove, violence (and violent imagery) seems an all to easy answer. So when we see violence against elected officials, it becomes easy to blame the rhetoric.
08 January 2011
Major League Movements
It's our first Soccer Saturday column, and we are focusing on the game at home. January is prime time for player movement in Major League Soccer, so we decided to update you on the biggest winter transfers.
This season, like many recent ones, there will be new teams in MLS, both from the northwest. The Portland Timbers best player appear to be in goal, with Troy Perkins likely wearing the Number One. Vancouver, however, looks to have a better side, at least for this first season. They have many players with MLS experience, including goalkeeper Joe Cannon and midfielder Shea Salinas. Defender Jay DeMerit, most recently of English club Watford, has already been named captain.
Of course, there are players going the other way across the Atlantic. Forward Robbie Findley, who started for the United States in the 2010 World Cup, moved from Real Salt Lake to Nottingham Forrest.
There are still several weeks left in the January transfer window, which closes at the end of the month. There have been many rumors of more Americans leaving MLS to play in Europe. Most notably Landon Donovan, who was on loan to Everton this time last year, but LA Galaxy have insisted that he is staying Stateside to rest. Donovan's teammate in Los Angeles, David Beckham, has also been pegged for a move back to the Premier League. While Manchester United would be the obvious choice, Tottenham, and several other clubs, have been mentioned as possible destinations.
No matter what happens in the transfer market, TWYII will be here to update the comings and going every Saturday in January.
This season, like many recent ones, there will be new teams in MLS, both from the northwest. The Portland Timbers best player appear to be in goal, with Troy Perkins likely wearing the Number One. Vancouver, however, looks to have a better side, at least for this first season. They have many players with MLS experience, including goalkeeper Joe Cannon and midfielder Shea Salinas. Defender Jay DeMerit, most recently of English club Watford, has already been named captain.
Of course, there are players going the other way across the Atlantic. Forward Robbie Findley, who started for the United States in the 2010 World Cup, moved from Real Salt Lake to Nottingham Forrest.
There are still several weeks left in the January transfer window, which closes at the end of the month. There have been many rumors of more Americans leaving MLS to play in Europe. Most notably Landon Donovan, who was on loan to Everton this time last year, but LA Galaxy have insisted that he is staying Stateside to rest. Donovan's teammate in Los Angeles, David Beckham, has also been pegged for a move back to the Premier League. While Manchester United would be the obvious choice, Tottenham, and several other clubs, have been mentioned as possible destinations.
No matter what happens in the transfer market, TWYII will be here to update the comings and going every Saturday in January.
06 January 2011
New Years at the Bordello
New Year's Eve is a time for most of us to reflect on what has just passed and look forward to what will come in the new year. For some of us, its a time to party. In a way, no band is better for both pastimes than Gogol Bordello. When they played the 9:30 Club in Washington, DC this new year's eve, TWY2 went to check it out.
The evening started with a blazing set by Washington DC natives Trouble Funk. They brought their style of 80s funk to the 9:30 stage and did a great job getting the crowd pumped for authentic Gypsy Punk, maybe a little too excited. Before the main act even got to the stage, concert-goers were already drinking heavy. When Gogol came on, the crowd went crazy, as usual. The normal energetic but friendly vibe at GB shows gave way to crazy dances and a few threats of physical violence. The band, however, was in great form. Starting out with oldies like "Not a Crime" and "Wonderlust King," Gogol quickly got the mosh pits going. Then the set list got heavy on songs from their new CD, which by our count was one of the best of 2010. "Trans-Continental Hustle," "Immigraniada," and "Break the Spell" show that the collective have only gotten tighter. Then came the miraculous "American Wedding" which was done a capella. "Start Wearing Purple" was given a long intro, which included the title of the song sung in the native languages of the band members, Russian, Spanish, and Chinese just to name a few. The encore included a cover of Johnny Cash's "Ghost Riders," and the closing medley which is one of the best parts of any GB show.
Gogol Bordello has been around for over a decade, and are still gaining in popularity. Frontman Eugene Hutz brings his manic guitar playing and revolutionary lyrics to a sound that blends traditional eastern European klezmer music with western punk. The new CD is produced by Rick Rubin, and with stints at festivals such as Bonnaroo and Coachella, the legend of the live shows has continued to grow. They have been touring the world for years, and if they come to a town near you, be sure to check them out!
The evening started with a blazing set by Washington DC natives Trouble Funk. They brought their style of 80s funk to the 9:30 stage and did a great job getting the crowd pumped for authentic Gypsy Punk, maybe a little too excited. Before the main act even got to the stage, concert-goers were already drinking heavy. When Gogol came on, the crowd went crazy, as usual. The normal energetic but friendly vibe at GB shows gave way to crazy dances and a few threats of physical violence. The band, however, was in great form. Starting out with oldies like "Not a Crime" and "Wonderlust King," Gogol quickly got the mosh pits going. Then the set list got heavy on songs from their new CD, which by our count was one of the best of 2010. "Trans-Continental Hustle," "Immigraniada," and "Break the Spell" show that the collective have only gotten tighter. Then came the miraculous "American Wedding" which was done a capella. "Start Wearing Purple" was given a long intro, which included the title of the song sung in the native languages of the band members, Russian, Spanish, and Chinese just to name a few. The encore included a cover of Johnny Cash's "Ghost Riders," and the closing medley which is one of the best parts of any GB show.
Gogol Bordello has been around for over a decade, and are still gaining in popularity. Frontman Eugene Hutz brings his manic guitar playing and revolutionary lyrics to a sound that blends traditional eastern European klezmer music with western punk. The new CD is produced by Rick Rubin, and with stints at festivals such as Bonnaroo and Coachella, the legend of the live shows has continued to grow. They have been touring the world for years, and if they come to a town near you, be sure to check them out!
05 January 2011
Feels Like The First Time
The 112th Congress convenes today, and much has been made about the partisanship in Washington. You don't have to look much farther than the incoming and outgoing Speakers of the House to prove the point. Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from San Fransisco, has been a champion of liberal causes and a strong ally of President Obama. Incoming Speaker John Boehner is from Ohio. He grew up working in the family business, and was a member of the First Republican Revolution in 1994. Both are viewed with suspicion, if not outright hatred, by the rank-and-file of the opposition parties.
The newly elected speaker, however, has seen his party's numbers grow by 62, and the Tea Party wave that earned him his seat expects big results. The House has already scheduled a vote to repeal Obamacare. The bill is expected to pass in the House, but is D.O.A. in the Senate, where Democrates still maintain control. Of course, the bill would never be signed by the President, so the vote is little more than symbolism. Where Republicans are more likely to make gains, it involves attacking certain provision within the healthcare law, such as the individual mandate. Some Democrates, including the White House, have been making signals that they are open to such ideas.
Republicans won by crying foul over Democrates spending, and they will be cutting everywhere they see fit. This will truly be the test of Boehner political skill. Previous Republican majorities have promised to cut spending before, but when they were given control of the purse strings, they spent money on pet projects and cut taxes, leading to the biggest deficits in history. In spring, Congress will have to pass a bill to raise the ceiling on the national debt. If they do not, the United States will default on our financial obligations and potentially ruin our credit and our economy. However, Tea Party activist will not tolerate more debt. Can Boehner corral his party and do what is right by the American economy, or will ideology trump practicality?
In the past, politicians from both parties have come to Washington promising big change, and instead, Washington changed them. That's an old line, but with a lot of truth. Although often times that change is for the worse, it doesn't have to be so. Circumstances change and the art of the possible becomes more important. Bill Clinton had big ideas about government working for the people, but when Congress went to the Republicans he fought to improve government programs rather than expand them. The Republicans now in control of the House have ideas about how government can "get out of the way," but they will find many constituents who want government to have a role in their lives. Staying true to their ideology while making government work efficiently for everyday Americans will be their biggest challenge.
The newly elected speaker, however, has seen his party's numbers grow by 62, and the Tea Party wave that earned him his seat expects big results. The House has already scheduled a vote to repeal Obamacare. The bill is expected to pass in the House, but is D.O.A. in the Senate, where Democrates still maintain control. Of course, the bill would never be signed by the President, so the vote is little more than symbolism. Where Republicans are more likely to make gains, it involves attacking certain provision within the healthcare law, such as the individual mandate. Some Democrates, including the White House, have been making signals that they are open to such ideas.
Republicans won by crying foul over Democrates spending, and they will be cutting everywhere they see fit. This will truly be the test of Boehner political skill. Previous Republican majorities have promised to cut spending before, but when they were given control of the purse strings, they spent money on pet projects and cut taxes, leading to the biggest deficits in history. In spring, Congress will have to pass a bill to raise the ceiling on the national debt. If they do not, the United States will default on our financial obligations and potentially ruin our credit and our economy. However, Tea Party activist will not tolerate more debt. Can Boehner corral his party and do what is right by the American economy, or will ideology trump practicality?
In the past, politicians from both parties have come to Washington promising big change, and instead, Washington changed them. That's an old line, but with a lot of truth. Although often times that change is for the worse, it doesn't have to be so. Circumstances change and the art of the possible becomes more important. Bill Clinton had big ideas about government working for the people, but when Congress went to the Republicans he fought to improve government programs rather than expand them. The Republicans now in control of the House have ideas about how government can "get out of the way," but they will find many constituents who want government to have a role in their lives. Staying true to their ideology while making government work efficiently for everyday Americans will be their biggest challenge.
04 January 2011
American (Re)Fugee
These are tough times in America. It has recently been reported that the current unemployment rate, which has been hovering around 9.5% for a couple years now, is the highest that it has been, for a prolonged period of time, than at any time since the 1930s. With this in mind, we decided to examine the lives of those most affected by hard times, the homeless.In his 2007 film Skid Row, Pras, formerly of the hip hop group The Fugees, lives as a homeless man for over a week. He arrives on Skid Row in Los Angeles, home to over 10,000 homeless individuals, with 9 dollars and a tent. He avails himself of the services of the local mission, panhandles for spare change, witnesses various kinds of drug use, and tries not to get killed. For security reasons, hidden cameras are used throughout most of the film. On several occasions, however, Pras' new neighbors suspect that they are being filmed or followed. In once instance, Pras strikes up a conversation with a police officer, and becomes paranoid about others thinking he is a snitch.
The film does a great job of shining a light on the plight of the homeless without making judgements or generalizations. However, it does give some insight into the mindset that causes one to move onto Skid Row, and the factors that keep them there. Often it starts with joblessness. Then factors such as isolation, mental illness, and substance abuse converge to limit individuals of their options. Once one has come to live in this state, those factors feel even greater. As the film points out, homelessness can offer a kind of solace all its own. A homeless person can come to define themselves that way, and they often see it as a choice that they have made. Even when presented with opportunities, fear, addiction, or anger can make homelessness seem like the only viable option.Of course, there are no easy answers, and this film does not pretend otherwise. Yet, it is apparent that the homeless need our attention. Ironically, Skid Row provides a community, away from the judgement and prejudices of the outside world. The majority, the people who have a bed and don't beg for food money, need to offer our community to those that society has forgotten. So next time a stranger ask you for spare change, and you think to yourself, "What is he really going to buy with this?", be sure to give whatever you can. Your conscience will be all the better for it. And who knows? He might just be an international recording artist.
To contact the Prasperity Project or for more information on Homelessness
03 January 2011
Mission Statement
Welcome! I am T. W. Young II and this is my New Politics & Culture Blog. With traditional print media dying a slow death, citizen journalist are becoming much more influential in determining how we see the world. Bloggers are able to react first to local news and bring it to the world. With this in mind, I want to throw my bait into the water and see if I get any bites. Of course, we'll be following all the happenings in Washington, DC, but also keeping up on the latest trends in music and movies. There are several features that we will use to keep up with all the news.
First, Tuesdays will be DVD Reviewsday Tuesdays. Every Tuesday, I'll be reviewing the newest and most interesting political documentaries, and trying to connect them to the issues of the day. Sundays are known for the Sunday Talk Shows, where all the news makers make news. TWYII will keep you informed, because you probably have a life. Finally, Saturdays are for football. No, not the NCAA. Saturdays are Soccer Saturdays. Soccer is the world's game, and this blog will examine how soccer reflects the trend of globalization and the United States' role in it.
Watch this space! We hope to update everyday, and hope to cover ALL topics. So not matter what your interest, keep an eye on us. If you have any ideas, or want our opinion on something, write us. Or maybe you just want to call us a bunch of communist! Either way.
First, Tuesdays will be DVD Reviewsday Tuesdays. Every Tuesday, I'll be reviewing the newest and most interesting political documentaries, and trying to connect them to the issues of the day. Sundays are known for the Sunday Talk Shows, where all the news makers make news. TWYII will keep you informed, because you probably have a life. Finally, Saturdays are for football. No, not the NCAA. Saturdays are Soccer Saturdays. Soccer is the world's game, and this blog will examine how soccer reflects the trend of globalization and the United States' role in it.
Watch this space! We hope to update everyday, and hope to cover ALL topics. So not matter what your interest, keep an eye on us. If you have any ideas, or want our opinion on something, write us. Or maybe you just want to call us a bunch of communist! Either way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)